The apostles belief in their Lord's refurrection, and in the fubfequent manifeftations of his divine power, was not imputable to enthufiafm. ふ IF during the life time of their Lord the apostles received fuch evidence of his. divine authority as no enthusiasm could fupply, fuch evidence as ap proves itself to our reason, and abundantly accounts for their ready obedience to their Master's call, and their adherence to his perfon, even unto death, much more did they receive clear and undeniable proofs of his refurrection from the dead.. # " If indeed we contemplate their fituation and cons duct at this important crifis, it will appear, that enthusiasm must have been wholly excluded from their minds. Suppose for a moment, that by fome unaccountable means, they had been worked up into an enthusiastic belief of miracles they had never feen, and of divine perfections, which existed only in their fond imaginations, how utterly impoffible that fuch a delufion fhould have furvived their crucified Lord. They had, as they' confefs, followed him as a tem 1 Matt. xvi. 21. to the end. Mark ix. 33-37. Matt. xx. to xxviii. compare Mark x. 35-45. Luke xxiv. 31. poral poral Meffiah, who would prove by miracles his claim to the throne of David, who would be received by the affembled thousands of Ifrael, refcue them from the Roman yoke, and fubjugate to their power the remoteft nations of the earth. But the event exhibited the total reverfe of this; their Mafter feized, bound, accufed, declaring "his kingdom was not of this world," and fubmitting, without reply or refiftance, to infult and outrage; they faw him perfecuted by the priests and rulers; they heard the populace clamour for his condemnation, till the Roman governor pronounced his ignominious doom; and they beheld him expire on the cross, dying the death of the accurfed, and lodged in the depths of the grave. Every fond hope feemed to be thus for éver blafted, every ambitious thought was crushed, every prejudice of their religion, their education, outraged. Alas! what delufion could have withstood fuch a fhock as this? what credulity could have longer blinded? what enthufiafm could have longer poffeffed them? how difappointed, how dejected, how alarm Even after his refurrection, they refumed for fome time the fame ideas of his kingdom, as appears from their question to him, Acts i. 6. "Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the "kingdom to Ifrael?" So ill prepared were they for the fpiritual and enlarged scheme of the gospel, till enlightened and directed by the miraculous effufion of the holy Spirit. 1 m ed, must the coolest and the steadieft minds have been at such a scene? and much more enflamed enthusiasts, with whom the bitterness of disappointment is ever proportioned to the extravagance of expectation, how unwilling must they be to refume a hope, which had thus deplorably deceived them? how flow to re-imbark in a caufe, thus plainly defperate? Such must have been the neceffary tenor of their minds ". And exactly conformable to this is the artless defcription which the evangelists record, of the feelings and conduct of their brethren. When the two difciples relate the crucifixion of their Lord, how full of perplexity and defpondence is their narrative". "But we, faid they, trusted that it had been he which "Should have redeemed Ifrael".-When affembled together, it was with the doors fhut for fear of the Jews." -But this ftate of doubt and difmay was foon changed to triumphant faith, and these very men became witneffes of the refurrection of their crucified Lord. By what means was this wondrous change atchieved? here it is the question principally rests. Was their faith in this great article the impulfe of enthu m Vid. this point very well illuftrated by Dr. Archibald Campbell, in his discourse, to prove the apostles were not enthusiasts, from p. 47 to 70. fiafm, or founded on the certainty of truth? Let us attend to the progrefs of this change. Was it enthusiasm which moved them to reject the evidence of those women, who had seen a vision of angels, who faid he was alive ", and who afterwards spoke to him in perfon? Two of the apostles difcovered, that the body was miffing, but as yet they "knew not the Scripture, that he must rise from the "dead;" they retired wondering, not believing '. Could enthusiasm have deceived them into a belief, that a dead body no longer occupied the fepulchre in which they had feen it lodged, and which they deliberately and minutely examined? how utterly impoffible!" He appeared to two separately, but neither believed they them." Was this extreme flownefs of faith a mark of enthusiasm? the very reverse; it proves, that their minds were utterly void of every hope which might delude, and on their guard against every artifice that might deceive them. But was it enthusiasm, to admit the evidence of their fenfes, when they repeatedly faw, and felt, and P Luke xxiv. I—II. 9 Mark xvi. 11. John xx. 1-19. Luke xxiv. 12. Mark xvi. 12. $ Paley's Evidences, p. 485, Dublin edition." The pre"fence and the absence of the dead body, are alike inconfiftent "with the hypothefis of enthusiasm; for if present, it must "have cured their enthusiasm at once; if abfent, fraud, not "enthusiasm, muft have carried it away." D 2 spoke u fpoke to their Lord restored to life, when he "" eat X y Was it enthusiasm to admit fuch evidence as this, which nothing but blindness or frenzy could reject? -yet the proofs they received did not ceafe here; forty days after they received the Spirit of God, descending with fenfible figns, and resting upon them." They were all with one accord in one "place, and fuddenly there came a found, as of á rufhing mighty wind, and it filled all the houfe "where they were fitting, and there appeared to "them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it fat, (6 upon each of them, and they were all filled with Luke xxiv. 36-43. * Luke xxiv. 51. Acts i. 6. "John xx. 24, 25.] *Acts i. 3. "the |