The great number of large estates in Ireland has been already remarked. The confiscated property was in general granted in portions of considerable extent, and the difficulties before alluded to have prevented much subdivision. No class of small proprietors or yeomanry, such as are still to be found in some English counties, ever existed in Ireland. Property constantly tends to accumulate in large masses. The large landed proprietor frequently purchases a neighbouring estate, and unites it permanently to his own by entailing it; thus diminishing still more the number of proprietors in fee. Land becomes vested in fewer hands, and the many are impoverished. It should be the object of the legislature to counteract this tendency, by promoting subdivision of freeholds again, not by positive laws, but by arrangements which, without interfering with the freedom of property, should encourage the sale of estates in smaller portions. Is it not of the utmost importance to the wellbeing of society, that the number of those who hold land in fee should be increased ? That land should be held in estates of various sizes? That a class of small proprietors or yeomanry should be raised up? To entitle the holder of a lease in perpetuity to purchase the fee, would have a very extensive effect, but would hardly produce any of the class of small landed proprietors above referred to; partly because they rarely hold land by long leases, and partly that they would not be able to make an immediate payment to the required extent. Something might be done to facilitate this result; partly perhaps by legislative enactments, partly by influencing public opinion. The purchase by a small farmer of his own farm might be freed from all stamp duty. Encouragement might be given to leases on long terms, with powers to fine down the rent from time to time, and finally to purchase the fee itself. Thus might we hope to create an independent yeomanry, thus might we encourage the exertions of the people, and emulate in our small farms the indefatigable industry, the careful garden cultivation of Belgium and Switzerland. It may be useful to look to the experience of other countries, both as respects large estates, and the effect of small properties on the industry and comforts of the people. Spain is held in large estates strictly entailed. The great mass of the people are deprived of all interest in the soil. The land is ill cultivated. Her peasantry are indolent and poor. M'Culloch, in reference to the low state of agriculture, makes the following remarks: "Probably moral causes have "had still more influence than physical, in retard "ing the progress of agriculture in the Peninsula. "At the head of the former must be placed the "vast extent of the lands, belonging to the nobi lity, clergy, and corporations. Mr. Townsend "mentions that the estates of three great lords— "the dukes of Osuna, Alba, and Medina Coeli, cover nearly the whole of the immense province " of Andalusia; and several in the other provinces 66 66 are hardly less extensive. These vast possessions are uniformly held under strict entail; and, speaking generally, are all managed by stewards, " anxious only to remit money to their masters, who "are frequently in embarrassed circumstances. The younger branches of the great families, though they inherit all their pride, inherit little or none "of their wealth. They are for the most part ex 66 66 66 ceedingly ill educated, and when not employed in government service, pass their days in a state of "slothful dependence." Arthur Young refers to the Island of Sardinia in the following terms: "What keeps it in its present unimproved situation, is chiefly the extent “of estates, the absence of some very great proprie66 tors, and the inattention of all. The duke of "Assinara has 300,000 livres a year, or £15,000 the duke of St. Piera has 160,000; the 66 sterling; * M'Culloch's Geographical Dictionary, art. Spain. "Marchese di Pascha has a very great property. 66 66 Many of them live in Spain. The Conde de Girah, a grandee of Spain, has an estate of two days' journey, reaching from Pinta to Oliustra. "The peasants are a miserable set that live in poor “cabins, without other chimneys than a hole in the "roof to let the smoke out.* In this magnificent island, which is nearly half the size of Ireland, the population scarcely exceeds 500,000. Since Young's time, some improvement has taken place, but it still appears to be in a miserable condition. It is even worse than Ireland. M'Culloch thus describes it: "The division of the island into "immense estates, most of which were acquired by 66 Spanish grandees; the want of leases, and the "restrictions on industry, have paralysed the in dustry of the inhabitants, and sunk them to the "lowest point in the scale of civilization. Since "1750, however, improvements of various kinds "have been slowly, but gradually gaining ground; " and within the last few years, several important "and substantial reforms have been introduced, "that will, it is to be hoped, conspire to raise this "fine island from the abyss into which it has been "cast by bad laws and bad government."† The beneficial effects of a numerous proprietary Young's Tour in France, vol. 2, page 267. † M'Culloch's Geographical Dictionary, art. Sardinia. are equally evident, whether we look to the cold and sterile lands of Norway, to the carefully irrigated plains of Northern Italy, to the mountain fastnesses of Switzerland, or the swampy polders of Holland and Belgium. "In Norway the land "is parcelled out into small estates, affording a "comfortable subsistence, and in a moderate degree the elegancies of civilized life, but nothing 66 more. With a population of 910,000 inhabitants "about the year 1819, there were 41,656 estates." "In Norway the law of succession has prevented 66 66 property from being accumulated in large masses. "The estates of individuals are in general small ; "and the houses, furniture, food, comforts, ways "and means of living among all classes appear to "approach more nearly to an equality to one 66 standard, than in any country in Europe. This "standard is far removed from any want or dis"comfort on the one hand, and from any luxury "or display on the other. The actual partition of "the land itself, seems in practice not to go below "such a portion of land as will support a family "comfortably, according to the habits and notions "of the country; and it is indeed evident that a 66 piece of ground without houses on it, and too "small to keep a family according to the national "estimation of what is requisite, would be of no |